Skip to main content

How I'm Going To End the Creation - Evolution Debate

You may or may not be aware that coffee has a very quick “mold-creation” rate.  If you leave a cup of coffee sitting out for too long, it will quickly begin to develop mold spores.  In fact, I would imagine, that in just a week or two a mug of coffee would develop a bog-like surface if left alone.


I’m placing a full mug of coffee in a secluded room where it will be undisturbed.  I’m also leaving instructions in my will that in 100 years, my grandchildren are to go into that room and document the lives of all the mold creatures that have come to life.

That’ll show those silly creationists.


  1. Didn't mean to offend in any way with my prior comment. I'm still honestly unsure as to whether this is a Poe. What are the rules for comment deletion here?

  2. feel free to discuss the post. if you think it's a "poe" that's fine, it probably doesn't need to be discussed. if you have to ask, that probably means something... but i'm just not interested in extending discussions about trolls, poes, etc...

    no offense taken, none meant, the problem is that once someone calls "poe!" or "troll!" no one else can comment without feeling stupid...

    these comments will self-destruct in 15 minutes.

  3. Maybe I should make it clear -- a Poe is not a troll nor an accusation of trolling. I'm legitimately interested to know whether this post is a sarcastic criticism of creationism or a sarcastic criticism of evolutionary theory. I suppose I simply lack the necessary context to figure it out.

    If this is a sarcastic criticism of evolutionary theory, I'm not sure what audience it's intended to appeal to, exactly. If this is a sarcastic criticism of creationism, then well played.

  4. hmm... i may be missing it here, but it seems like you are saying, "If this post supports my view, well played. If it confronts my view, it's not well done."

    i may be oversimplifying. i think you're probably making more of it than you need to. does it have to be one or the other? does it have to be sarcastic? does it have to be a criticism?

  5. Well, obviously there is sarcasm involved, and unless this is an extremely subtle appeal for total objective relativism, one side or the other is clearly being criticized.

    I was still YEC quite recently, so I'm just as miffed by grotesque caricatures of creationism as I am by grotesque caricatures of evoluationary theory. Note that I didn't say the post wasn't well-done, only that I couldn't figure out what audience it was directed toward as a sarcastic criticism of evolution. Interpreted as a criticism of evolution, this is a far more distorted caricature than if it is interpreted as a criticism of creationism.

  6. have you ever seen a cup of coffee that has been sitting undisturbed for two weeks?

    that's the real point...

  7. leaving the coffee cup sitting doesn't show anything. Mold and bacteria growing in the cup (or a glass of water, or on food, etc) are pre-existing - either in previously small amounts in the coffee, or transferred from the environment into the cup.

    This isn't life from non-life, or one kind of life turning into a different kind of life. Let me know when frogs or lizards emerge from the coffee...

  8. and there you have it, tentativecynic. sometimes, you just have to wait. :)

  9. Creation. Evolution. Whatever.
    I'm rinsing out my coffee cup immediately.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Inability of Metaphors and Similes to Describe the Church

The difference between a metaphor and a simile is the word "like."   (that's perhaps overly simplistic, but useful: Metaphor: You're a Dog. Simile: You're like a Dog. Of course, neither a metaphor nor a simile really does a good job of  proclaiming reality: You aren't a Dog. Often times, Jesus and His friends used metaphors and similes to  describe the church. Some of them would be: The church is (like a) house The church is (like a) family The church is (like a) body The church is (like a) temple All of these are useful for helping us understand some nature or  function of the church, but none of them are terribly effective as a  comprehensive description of the reality of the church: The church is not a house The church is not a family The church is not a body The church is not a temple The church is the church. It is completely different than any other  organism/organization known to man. It is a spiritually-joined,  mis

Manipulation is Not Leadership.

Proverbs says alot about flattery. One of my favorite proverbs reminds us that the wounds of a friend are preferable to the kisses of an enemy. Often people who don’t really have your best interest in mind will use flattery to manipulate you. I get frustrated with myself when I slip into manipulation by flattery mode. But flattery isn’t the only way we manipulate people. Some people are master manipulators. They spend their time evaluating a person, figure out that person’s “buttons”, and then press all the right ones to get what they desire from that person. Some people are “passive-aggressive” manipulators; they’ll bully a person by withdrawing and being silent. Is there anything wrong with manipulation? Many leadership “gurus” talk about the concept of “influence”, as being one of, if not the core competencies of leaders. One author says “leadership is influence - nothing more, nothing less”. I read another book recently that said, “to lead others, an individual or group must